Ford Everest v Toyota Prado comparison review

Ford Everest v Toyota Prado comparison review

Ford’s new seven-seat Everest sets out to scale uncharted territory for the Blue Oval, but standing in its path is the current king of the hill, the freshly updated Toyota Prado.

Can’t wait to see the final scores? Jump to the verdict now.

EVEREST is an appropriate name for something wearing a Ford badge right now. The brand has a mountain to climb as it ends local car-making, and this new SUV can literally do that as a ladder-chassis, seven-seat, proper family off-roader. It’s part of the onslaught of new products for Ford Australia, and is the new kid in town chasing the likes of the market-leading Toyota Prado, its sparring partner here, which has been treated to a new, downsized diesel engine.

Ford -Everest -and -Toyota -Prado -parked -side -roadPrado is the best-selling Toyota SUV, and it too blends off-road credentials with civic duties as a seven-seat family wagon. And, more often than not, the cabin of either of these cars – both starting at the $55K mark for the diesel versions we’re driving here – will be smeared with special sauce, crayons and dog saliva rather than the rough and tumble of genuine Burke and Wills exploration.

The Thai-built  Ford Everest is all-new as an SUV, but it’s based on the successful yet rough and ready Ford Ranger. That means it has genuine off-road capabilities, sturdiness and roominess. It comes as standard with seven seats, and this model here is the mid-spec Trend, expected to be the most popular showroom choice.

Ford -Everest -driving -frontThe Toyota Prado we have here isn’t the GXL we wanted: instead, it’s the entry-level seven-seat GX, which means it has dour black doorhandles and grille instead of chrome, and misses out on side-steps. It’s $58,978 as-tested, but the step up to Prado GXL brings sat-nav, more cupholders and a leather wheel that our test car is missing. At $61,990 for the higher-spec Prado (before the addition of metallic paint), only a few hundred bucks split these two, with sat-nav and Sunset metallic paint pushing Everest to $62,090.

For that ask, Everest rides on 18-inch alloy wheels to go with the handsome exterior. That solid look sees a successful translation of traditional Ford truck-like nose with a definite Tonka feel up front, but the more contemporary rump seems oddly proportioned, as if the front and rear were designed for two different vehicles. So too the Everest’s awkward stance: the spaces between the Bridgestones and the wheelarches are huge, and it looks tall and narrow at some angles.

Toyota -Prado -driving -on -road -front -sideThe Prado is far less interesting visually and looks dated in comparison. The nose is garnished with nasty plastic in an attempt to counter its slab-sided styling and, while the spare-wheel on the tailgate gives it an authentic off-road vibe, it’s plain and hardly inspiring to look at. Yet on its 17-inch wheels, the Prado offers better overall proportions and stance, and even if the detailing isn’t there in terms of design, the Toyota easily outclasses the Everest with panel fit. The gaping gap between that clamshell bonnet and guards is one of the Ford’s many inconsistencies.

Toyota -Prado -driving -on -dirt -rear -sideThe Prado also has links with its commercial sibling, the Hilux, although it’s the cheaper Fortuner that is directly based on the popular pick-up. Prado’s new 1GD-FTV 2.8-litre four-cylinder common-rail turbo-diesel will also be offered under the bonnet of all three Toyotas. For Prado, it replaces the old 3.0-litre turbo-diesel, and is an impressive unit as it has higher compression and 227cc less, yet delivers 40Nm more torque, with 450Nm at 1600rpm.

Toyota -Prado -driving -on -clay -rear -sideThe diesel is teamed with a new six-speed automatic, with two overdrives. At 110km/h it spins almost silently at 1700rpm, and even around town its note is pleasant and its character smooth. Toyota has clearly worked hard on refinement, something Ford hasn’t achieved with the Everest’s grunty 3.2-litre five-pot. Making 143kW and producing 470Nm from 1750rpm, it spins at 2000rpm at 110km/h and is much noisier while doing so. It’s also gruff and coarse under load, so small urban throttle inputs result in an angry, disgruntled note even if it’s an otherwise willing unit. Engine refinement sees a clear win for Toyota.

Everest -v -Prado -front -driving -dirtPrado’s superior smoothness and refinement isn’t without its drawbacks. Everest is noticeably more powerful and responsive. The Ford takes 11.6sec to cover 0-100km/h, a massive 1.9sec faster than the Prado, although the gap narrows down the quarter-mile as the Toyota steams within 0.7sec of the Ford’s 18.0sec effort. Despite the performance advantage, Everest was equally parsimonious on test, with both recording 10.4L/100km, while the Ford can tow 3000kg, 500kg more than the Toyota.

The biggest single ace for Everest is its interior. It’s light years ahead of Prado’s, which looks like a parts-bin special from the ’80s. The velour seat trim on our GX mimics Gran’s Cressida and the centre stack above the 7.0-inch display looks moulded from an off-the-shelf generic HVAC kit. It’s fifty shades of grey, with basic white-on-black square buttons and plain dials. Its hard plastics are utilitarian and scream functional, as opposed to the Ford’s fashionable.

Ford -Everest -driving -on -clay -rear -sideThere’s far more shape to the Everest’s dash design, with much better materials, despite the fact it doesn’t feel as solid as Prado’s. Its crisp digital instrumentation and 8.0-inch centre touchscreen shame the Toyota’s basic effort, even if the Prado’s is more intuitive by its simple nature. The Ford’s digital readouts are more complex, and the incessant chime for the driver’s door being open sent everyone on test slightly crazy, but it’s clearly 2015 inside.

Ford -Everest -interiorThat’s also true when it comes to Everest’s litany of driver aids and safety gear that Prado can’t match: radar cruise control and lane-keep assist are two key Ford items Prado misses out on, even at GXL level. Both cars come with automatic emergency braking, hill-start assist and hill-descent control, as well as reversing camera and seven airbags. The Everest has just been ANCAP tested and, as expected, matches the Toyota’s five-star rating.

Toyota -Prado -front -seats -interiorPrado hits back with more space, yet this is not a clear-cut victory for the Toyota. The second and third rows are more spacious than the Ford’s, with greater head, foot and ample leg room in every seat. The Everest’s third row is a low point, hampered by a lack of foot room, otherwise both cars have loads of space and will carry the family with aplomb. The seats fold close to flat in both, with Ford’s floor less interrupted; seats up, the Everest claims a win with far more space behind the third row.

In the driver’s seat of the Prado you’ll notice the spare wheel impinging on rear visibility. And its heavy tailgate opens into traffic. While off-roaders may prefer the easier access when compared with the Everest’s full-size alloy located under its boot floor, you don’t need huge biceps to operate the upward-opening hatch on the Ford because it opens electronically via the key fob.

Toyota -Prado -rearThat says a lot about these two vehicles. Prado is geared towards rough roads, Everest more the rough and tumble of the family. A few key features put the Prado ahead here: constant all-wheel drive with a proper mechanical four-wheel-drive system, and twin fuel tanks as standard that enable a 1400km-odd touring range. That said, Everest is far from a dunce off-road. Yet the Ford’s on-road dynamics better the Prado’s.

The instant you sit in the Everest’s sculpted driver’s seat, it feels more agile, responsive and energetic. Even if the driving position is hampered by a lack of steering-column reach adjustment, its poise, roadholding and more elastic diesel leave the Prado behind on a winding mountain road. The Toyota rolls much more and can’t deal with its weight as it shifts around during braking, under acceleration and with every driver input. 

Toyota -Prado -rear -driving -clayThe Everest, in contrast, uses its front-end more effectively, which means corner entry is much faster, with momentum building from there thanks to its superb balance. The electric steering weights up well, and responds much faster than Prado’s hydraulic system. This is a long way from a Ford Ranger with a seven-seat body dropped on top; with its own coil-spring rear suspension in lieu of the Ranger’s leaf springs, the Everest is so agile and sharp you’ll forget that you’re in a 2.4-tonne SUV.

Knocking off the Prado on a twisty section is one thing, but the Toyota still has some distinct advantages. Softer suspension and smaller wheels enable a more supple ride over pock-marked and bumpy roads, with the firm Everest suffering head-toss and movement that makes it a much less cossetting cabin to be in.

Toyota -Prado -parked -frontOn top of this, Prado is a well-established, strong-selling nameplate with excellent resale, reputation and proven off-road ability. A superior four-wheel-drive system and capabilities, as well as the sturdy cabin and genuine back-of-beyond features, such as those 150-litre capacity twin fuel tanks, mean an 80-litre Everest would struggle to match it in Australia’s most arid, remote locations. As well as its superior ride, Prado’s marginally greater passenger space makes it more suited to long journeys than the Ford.

Everest -v -Prado -side -parked -fieldYet as a capable off-road family friendly SUV, Everest has a cache of advantages. It is far more up-to-date in terms of styling, safety and connectivity equipment, and it can still carve up a bush track with ease. It’s just as economical, yet also more fun to drive and faster point-to-point. Everest is an SUV that you want while Prado feels like a vehicle you need – an accountant’s choice, a no-fuss boss’s order for a capable unit, as opposed to a desirable vehicle.

Bringing a new nameplate to this competition will be tough, but the Everest is a better all-round vehicle than the popular Prado. So while the Ford has a mountain to climb, it’s hardly starting from the bottom.

Why Everest is not a Territory

Ford -Everest -driving -frontFord says Everest is not a replacement for the Aussie-made Territory, despite similarities.

Indeed, Ford Oz will have a two-pronged attack, with the Canadian-built Edge to sit below Everest. Edge uses the same CD4 platform as Mondeo, with Aussie-spec versions expected to get the 154kW/450Nm 2.0-litre turbo-petrol engine. Pricing will kick off from around $45K. Given the success of Territory, Ford may keep the name.


The Everest wins in terms of connectivity with a pair of 12V plugs up front, another in the rear for second-row passengers and another within the boot’s cargo area. It also has a 230V/150W plug, as well as a pair of USBs and one auxiliary connection.

Prado has only a single USB up front – yet it’s covered, unlike Everest’s, so it is protected against dust – along with a 12V plug, with a second 12V in the rear of the console along with a 220V socket. There’s also another 220V plug in the boot area.

Both come with CD players.

Toyota -Prado -interiorPrado’s reversing camera is of little use in the sun, so you have to revert to those ample mirrors and sensors instead of a screen. Its digital clock screams “Casio”, and not in a retro-cool way, either.

The Ford’s second row doesn’t offer a large enough aperture for access, perhaps a sign that it can only fit smaller occupants. Prado is much better packaged here; if you’re an adult and have to be stuck in the third row, make it Prado’s, as your legs will fit too.

Ford -Everest -rear -seatsPrado’s dash is generic, but if its simplicity bores compared to the competition, at least it’s intuitive and obvious. It’s ergonomics for dummies. The Everest’s more complex displays look clean and crisp, but take some learning. The raft of info available on the Everest’s symmetrical instrument cluster is a plus, but it’s overlayed by other data, so not as useful as it first seems. For instance, if a passenger opens the rear door, it overlays the data with a “rear door open” signal. And when you turn the engine on it tells you that too – overriding all other data.


Price as tested: $62,090 ** Includes metallic paint ($550) and sat-nav with voice activation ($600).
NCAP rating: 5 stars (Aus)
Fuel economy: 10.4L/100km (test average)
Acceleration: 0-100km/h: 11.6sec
Plus: Excellent dynamics for its type; value for money; safety and tech features
Minus: Awkward stance; build quality; firm ride; engine refinement
Verdict:  6.5/10

Price as tested: $58,978 ** Includes seven seats ($2500), metallic paint ($550), tow bar ($688), tow ball ($27.35) and trailer wiring harness ($223).
NCAP rating: 5 stars (Aus)
Fuel economy: 10.4L/100km (test average)
Acceleration: 0-100km/h: 13.5sec
Plus: Build quality; ride; spaciousness; off-road and long-distance touring ability
Minus: Dated, plasticky cabin; sloppy handling; lethargic performance
Verdict: 6.0/10

LPA Likeitleaseit Button 300X50

Sign up here to receive the latest round-up of Wheels news, reviews and video highlights straight to your inbox each week.

Want free access to 5 years of Wheels archive content? Sign up now!