Mazda CX-5 v Hyundai Tucson v Ford Kuga v Subaru Forester comparison review

Mazda CX-5 v Hyundai Tucson v Ford Kuga v Subaru Forester comparison review

Can the turbocharged, top-spec Hyundai Tucson Highlander run with the best of the medium SUV bunch, when each is in its most powerful form?

Can’t wait to see the final scores? Jump to the verdict now.

THERE’S plenty of irony in Hyundai choosing to revive the Tucson nameplate for its new-generation medium-size ‘soft-roader’. While the exhumed title is Apple Pie to the core, and Tucson’s interior has a Californian twang courtesy of Hyundai’s Irvine design studio, the remaining collaborators read like a semi-final for Eurovision.

One-time Audi stylist and purveyor of Kia’s recent design savvy, Peter Schreyer, has lent his German aesthetic to the exterior, while Hyundai’s Czech factory handles the nuts and bolts (unless you’re buying an Active X variant, in which case your Tucson still hails from South Korea). But Australia lent a hand as well. Recognising that fun-to-drive DNA should be part of Hyundai’s brand character, this distinctive new locally tuned SUV delivers the dynamic entertainment to bolster its sharp-looking new suit.

Ford Kuga Subaru Forester Mazda CX-5-Hyundai Tucson comparison reviewBut life’s tough at the pointy end of Australia’s favourite SUV class. Earlier this year, Ford gifted its great-handling, sweet-steering Kuga with the Mondeo’s gutsy 178kW 2.0-litre Ecoboost turbo-petrol, addressing arguably its main weakness in the process, while Mazda’s likeable CX-5 had a magic wand waved over it, enhancing its appearance, tactility and all-round ability. Subaru, too, has been on its game, introducing fresh multimedia and a bunch of aesthetic improvements to embellish its class-leading Forester. Clearly, the Tucson has a fight on its hands.

Three turbos, one biggie

Given Hyundai’s ‘driver’s car’ claims, we headed straight for the petrolhead variants. Tucson’s sporting polish gleams brightest in range-topping Highlander AWD spec, packing a detuned version of the Veloster coupe’s 1.6-litre direct-injection turbo four, tied to a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission. Hyundai asks $43,490 for the privilege, placing the top Tucson eye-to-eye with the Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring ($43,390), Ford Kuga Titanium ($44,990) and Subaru Forester XT Premium ($47,990).

Hyundai Tucson frontUnlike its overstyled and dated ix35 predecessor, the Tucson has real presence in the flesh. Its broad, masculine grille, aggressively angled headlights and handsomely proportioned shape look very European, especially when garnished with the Highlander’s 19-inch alloys. The Tucson’s rear is less striking, but its distinctive horizontal tail-lights and bumper-mounted rego plate keep the Euro flavour alive, to the point where you’d never know it was a Hyundai if you covered the ‘H’ logos.

In comparison, Mazda’s freshened CX-5 looks proudly Japanese. No matter where you look, its new-for-2015 details – grille, lights and wheels, as well as a much prettier dashboard – have enhanced its visuals considerably, in contrast to the dead-ringer appearance of the MY15 Forester. If only Subaru invested some time adding techy sparkle to the boxy Forester’s dated headlights, and less chintz to its dorky grille, people may want to buy it simply for the way it looks.

Ford Kuga frontThe Kuga is also a bit of an acquired taste, and looks exactly as it did in 2013. In some ways, that’s a good thing – Ford’s controversial ‘dustbuster’ grille has yet to migrate to the Kuga’s snout – though even the Titanium variant’s LED lights and big 19-inch hoops can’t quite manage to overcome the Kuga’s blocky body.

But looks can be deceptive. Beneath the Kuga’s creased bonnet resides one of Ford’s best engines. Packing a solid 178kW, backed by 345Nm from 2000-4500rpm, the 2.0-litre turbo-petrol four is a vast improvement over the underwhelming 1.6 turbo still fitted to the base Ambiente, and its sweetly throaty induction growl is the perfect accompaniment for the Kuga’s hot-hatch-like performance.

Subaru Forester XT frontSlicing more than three seconds from the old car’s 0-100km/h time and over two seconds from its standing 400m sprint, the 2.0-litre turbo Titanium is now a genuine match for Subaru’s ever-thrusty Forester XT. Indeed, 15.2sec for the traditional quarter-mile is Fiesta ST territory, while around town Kuga’s winning 3.4sec 0-60km/h time combines with its fizzy engine note to make it feel even livelier than it is. If only its transmission had a Sport mode that effectively supported its terrific engine.

Still, the spritely Kuga can’t quite match the deceptively brisk Forester XT. While 2015’s CVT-equipped generation isn’t quite as rapid as lighter models of yesteryear, the turbo Forrie’s seven-dead to 100km/h isn’t hanging about. And it gets there with impressive smoothness, its tacho needle rigid at 5800rpm as it surges ahead with just a faint hint of horizontally opposed character from its 177kW/350Nm 2.0-litre flat-four.

Sweet and addictive

Interestingly, Subaru’s steering wheel-mounted ‘SI-Drive’ system – with Intelligent, Sport and Sport# modes – has never worked as well as it does in the Forester XT. Finally, eco-minded Intelligent has enough turbo-boosted torque to work with, backed by Subaru’s excellent ‘Lineartronic’ CVT transmission, to make it a viable option for general driving. Sport perks up throttle response and adds meat to the steering weight, while Sport# introduces eight artificially inserted steps into the ratio set and combines neatly with the XT’s wheel-mounted paddles to provide engine braking in corners. But Forester accelerates quicker in regular CVT mode.

Ford Kuga Subaru Forester Mazda CX-5-Hyundai Tucson comparison reviewResponding to popular demand, Mazda added a Sport mode to its six-speed ‘SkyActiv-Drive’ auto on CX-5 petrols for 2015 and it’s a beauty. Eager to downshift under brakes, yet willing to hold a gear when the driver’s inner Ricciardo intensifies, the CX-5’s Sport mode treads the fine line between keen and crazed with aplomb. And yet its auto does an equally fine job in regular mode, with less of a propensity to grab sixth gear than it once had, and a slightly sweeter edge to its throaty, revvy engine.

Thanks to the strength of the competition, the turbo Tucson has its work cut out, even running an up-to-date drivetrain. Tipping the scales at a solid 1690kg (64kg more than the CX-5) and with only 130kW against the 2.5-litre Mazda’s 138kW, the Hyundai relies on its seven tight ratios, rapid dual-clutch upshifts and the breadth of its torque – 265Nm from 1500-4500rpm – to marginally outpace the eager Mazda. But in its upper reaches, the Tucson’s engine starts to sound a bit strained, which is at odds with its slick around-town demeanour.

Hyundai Tucson frontIndeed, much of the time the Tucson’s union of engine and transmission is superb, giving off a genuine impression of German-style refinement, bar the odd hiccup at low speeds. But then, to varying degrees, the Forester’s silken muscle, the Kuga’s addictive energy and the Mazda’s effervescent urge are all equally as sweet. In this company, the Hyundai needs to be better than merely good.

There’s agility, and then there’s finesse

Same goes for its dynamics. Hyundai Oz worked hard at achieving both ride and handling excellence with the Tucson and for the most part they’ve succeeded.

With the console-mounted Drive Mode button switched to Sport, which improves the consistency of its steering weighting considerably while perking up the transmission’s shift mapping, the Tucson is unexpected fun to drive. Its chassis has an innate sense of poise, with the ability to interact via its rear-end to adjust its angle of cornering attack. Yet, thanks to the trustworthiness of its connection with the road, and the marvellous grip from its Continental rubber, you can really throw the Tucson around, without ESC trying to hobble your fun. It has great turn-in, too, and a pleasingly thin-rimmed steering wheel clad in quality leather.

Hyundai Tucson rearThrow a four-up load and a challenging road at the Tucson, however, and its ability unravels a little. While its impressive ride maintains its suppleness, it lacks the firm rebound control of the Kuga and can feel a touch underdamped at times. It was the only car to kiss its right-front bump stop when pushed hard over one particular mid-corner bump and, while it never forgets how to party, your family may not be so enthused.

Then there’s Tucson’s engine, which tries hard but lacks inspiration, and its transmission, which won’t downshift early enough when calling for engine braking into a corner. And its brakes, which performed a pair of brilliant 34.9m stops from 100km/h at the strip but became quite whiffy during our back-to-back runs.

Ford Kuga rearFor medium-SUV handling par excellence, look no further than Ford’s delightful Kuga. Blessed with a level of finesse and dynamic nuance that is unmatched by any rival here, the Kuga remains the benchmark. Its involving rear-end feels exquisitely balanced when you trail-brake into a corner, settling onto its outside rear tyre like the Tucson (and the CX-5 and Forester, for that matter) but with better damping control and greater overall polish. Then there’s the Kuga’s steering, which only needs one setting to deliver outstanding feedback, making it incredibly easy to place in a corner. In comparison, Tucson’s Comfort mode is all a bit light and fluffy, if still with a most un-Korean level of precision.

Mazda CX-5 side rearCompared to its former bosom buddy, Mazda’s CX-5 takes a bit of warming up before it really starts to boogie. There’s an aloofness to the CX-5, as if it goes where it’s pointed but isn’t particularly encouraging until you really begin to hustle it. When you do, though, the Mazda demonstrates the depth of its talents.

Backed by a super-responsive drivetrain, if you set up the CX-5 by rolling some weight onto its back end, she’s as agile as the best of them, with a surprising amount of oversteer allowed by the ESC before it nibbles at the edges. The CX-5’s retuned electric steering is a lot more consistent in its weighting than it used to be, and its 225/55R19 Toyos grip pretty well, though they produce a lot more tyre squeal than the excellent Continentals worn by the Hyundai and Ford.

Subaru Forester side rearWith the Forester, tyres and steering are its kryptonite. To please the snow and dirt set, Subaru fits the XT with all-terrain 225/55R18 Bridgestone Duelers and they ultimately aren’t up to its performance. As a result, its stability control can be quite intrusive when you’re driving enthusiastically, but the XT is only the press of an ESC button away from being really quick. That and a better set of tyres.

The more deftly you drive the Forester, and the greater your commitment, the stronger its ability. It has tremendous drive out of corners and, while it rolls a fair bit, it’s a hoot to play around with. Pity you drive on what its chassis says, though, and not its steering. Even in weightier Sport or Sport# mode, the Forester’s tiller lacks the crispness of its rivals, Tucson included.

Bump or body control?

But when the going gets tough, boy does it ride. Over our punishing four-up section, the Forester made a mockery of all surfaces, blotting bumps while remaining level and smooth, backed by decent refinement, as well as nuanced and keen handling. Add outstanding vision and a great drivetrain and the whole exercise seemed like a walk in the park.

For body control and all-round confidence, the Kuga shines, though it doesn’t gift its passengers with the same level of suppleness the Forester does. It’s the Hyundai that comes closest to matching the Subaru’s comfort, and in low-speed situations on better roads, it’s actually the better of the two. But it transmits more road noise than the Ford on the same tyres.

The firmer Mazda also has better body control than the Hyundai, but unlike the Euro Ford, it can’t match the supple nuance of the Korean’s Aussie-tuned chassis. The CX-5 can feel a bit stiff-legged over sharp bumps and, in contrast to the Tucson and Kuga, fails to give the impression of a completely happy union between its pretty 19s and its suspension tune. Seated up front, its Toyos are quieter than the Tucson’s Contis, but nothing can out-hush the Forester.

An ace on the inside

Hyundai Tucson interiorThere’s one final ace up the Hyundai’s sleeve that no one expected. While it’s the shortest car here, it has the most rear seat room and easily the most comfortable rear bench, trimmed in lovely soft leather (with perforated centres) in Highlander spec. Hell, the plush front pair get heaters and coolers, not to mention full power adjustment, outshining the undoubted excellence of the Kuga’s front chairs. About the only thing we don’t like in the Tucson’s airy cabin is the layer upon layer of drab plastics, and the conservatism of its design. It’s a bit, shall we say, American.

Mazda CX-5 interiorFor cabin quality, nothing can touch the updated CX-5. Best plastics, best switchgear, best trim and best overall cabin appearance go a long way to compensating for its less-than-perfect rear seat environment – average vision, no rear air vents – and seats that you sit on, rather than in. Yet its quality extends all the way to its tailgate, with an inbuilt luggage cover and one-touch rear-seat folding.

Subaru Forester interior

The Subey doesn’t have the greatest seats in the world, either, particularly for lateral support, but on a long trip its comfort, and the incredibly airy feel of its low window line and deep windscreen, are a blessing. We also love the Forester’s new multimedia set-up, and its Harman Kardon stereo is a bass-cranking beauty.

So, which has the edge overall?

Yet there’s something deeply compelling about the XT Premium’s pragmatism. And beneath its practical sense is a fast, refined, roomy, entertaining SUV with enough runs on the board to guarantee near-faultless operation and strong resale, despite its $48K ask. We’d fit better tyres, but the Forester is an SUV that will keep on giving if you don’t mind the look.

The Tucson may not have the Subaru’s badge cred, or its ultimate composure, but for 98 percent of the time this handsome slice of German-inspired SUV is about as far from its American naming roots as possible. It’s nicely built, cleverly packaged, comfortable, practical, and fun to drive, with the polish its ix35 predecessor lacked. But is it better than the CX-5 and Kuga?

Ford Kuga interior

As an all-rounder, yes. The Kuga is a great driver’s SUV, albeit a relatively thirsty one, and pampers its front-seat occupants. But it lacks the thoroughness of the Tucson’s packaging, even though the Ford makes up for a lot with its superb steering and throaty engine.

Its Hiroshima rival is more stylish, more tactile and much more efficient, yet the CX-5 doesn’t quite reach the level of comfort, practicality and driving enjoyment of the Subaru and Hyundai either. Yes, it can be an engaging drive, and it’s definitely a better car than it was last year, but in a fight as tight as this, its few flaws push it down the podium.

So, Hyundai goes from nowhere to a near-match with the Forester. The Koreans might have taken a while to see what it takes to make a really good car, but in AWD 1.6T Highlander guise, the Tucson certainly has it.

Inside: Ford Kuga Titanium Ecoboost

SOME testers disliked the Kuga’s bulky dashboard so much, it would be a deal-breaker, though an update incorporating Ford’s new-gen SYNC2 multimedia screen is on the way. Thick pillars with curved bases restrict vision a little, but steering wheel, seats and driving position are beyond reproach. Manual front passenger seat gets crank-handle height adjustment and side bolsters that dial in and out.

Ford Kuga boot spaceKuga suffers a rather anorexic rear-seat cushion and its boot could be bigger, though foot-waving electric tailgate opener is a unique touch.

Inside: Hyundai Tucson Highlander

TUCSON’S cabin is clear but characterless. Needs the two-tone trim option (pictured) to overcome its drab plastics, many of which appear scratch-prone. But its upholstery is good quality and its seat comfort is excellent, front and rear. This group’s largest sunroof combines with an airy cabin to make Tucson feel luxuriously roomy. But its centre touchscreen can be confusing and audio quality is average.

Hyundai Tucson boot spaceTucson's generous boot somehow fits a 245/45R19 full-size Continental under its floor. It’s remarkably well-packaged for an AWD wagon.

Inside: Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring

Facelifted CX-5 cabin has been transformed from slightly disappointing to class best. Mazda kept the good bits – classy dials, superb steering wheel, quality switchgear – and revamped the centre console, adding its own MZD Connect sat-nav system. No rival can match CX-5’s finish and trim quality, though its seats don’t quite achieve true comfort, and its rear section is a little austere, lacking air vents.

Mazda CX-5-boot spaceNeatly trimmed Mazda boot appears larger than its claimed capacity. Seat-fold mechanism is brilliant but its tailgate is manual.

Inside: Subaru Forester XT Premium

IT’S unfortunate Subaru doesn’t devote as much attention to finessing the finer details like Mazda does – cue plasticky power window switches and the budget plastic panel they’re mounted on – but that takes nothing away from Forester’s all-round ability. It might not be the prettiest bauble on the tree, but it’s certainly near the top, with brilliant vision, a superb multimedia interface and outstanding audio quality.

Subaru Forester boot spaceForester scores a (slow-acting) electric tailgate and packs a full-size spare under its stepped floor. Protector mat, scuff guard optional.

Changing shifts

HAVING a faux-manual mode in an SUV might seem like gimmickry, but you can’t discount the benefits for engine braking. And when your SUV has a sports flavour, a bit of manual action is a nice thing to have.

Despite a lack of steering-wheel paddles, the CX-5’s set-up is the most driver-oriented. Its tip-shift gate works in our favoured style – forward for a downshift, back for an upshift – and it will hold a manually selected gear at redline. It also has an intuitive ‘Sport’ mode that’s so good at pre-empting your driving mood the tip-shift gate is often unnecessary.

The Forester is the only car here to score flappy paddles, though its eight-ratio stepped CVT never feels or sounds as satisfying as an auto with specific gears.

The Kuga’s six-speed auto matches revs on downshifts and mates well with the engine’s muscle, but its Sport mode is little different to regular Drive and its tip-shift (on the side of the gearlever) is awkward and infuriatingly rubbish to use.

The Tucson has a traditional +/– gate next to Drive, but it works in reverse to the Mazda. It also upshifts at redline and won’t downshift early enough when prodded. Its Sport mode is disguised in a ‘Drive Mode’ button near the shift lever that also tweaks steering weight and throttle response, and perks up the dual-clutcher’s shift mapping.

Equipment levels

PAYING $43.5K for the Tucson Highlander buys lots of stuff. It gets a full suite of safety electronics (AEB, lane-keeping and lane-change assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, trailer stability assist and active cruise), as well as leather trim, heated/cooled front seats (10-way electric for driver, 8-way for passenger), keyless entry/start, a huge glass sunroof, and LED lights at both ends (directional at the front).

About the only areas the $4500-dearer Forester XT Premium upstages the Tucson are its wheel paddles and its far superior eight-speaker Harman Kardon stereo. Otherwise, it wears smaller wheels and has a rear camera but no sensors.

The $45K Kuga Titanium gets active park assist and a hands-free power tailgate, but no electric front passenger seat or autonomous electronic safety tech (it’s a $1600 extra, including tyre pressure monitors).

The CX-5 GT saves $100 over the Tucson, but asks more for auto-brake tech and blind-spot monitoring, and doesn’t offer forward collision warning, lane-departure assistance or LED headlights. Small sunroof, too.


Price as tested: $44,085 *Includes metallic paint ($595)
NCAP rating: not tested
Fuel economy: 10.9L/100km (test average)
Acceleration: 0-100km/h: 8.1sec (tested)
Plus: Strong and handsome; entertaining chassis; quality seating; ample room
Minus: Uninspiring engine; plain cabin design; short service intervals
Verdict: 8.0/10

Price as tested: $47,990
NCAP rating: 5 stars (Aus)
Fuel economy: 11.4L/100km (test average)
Acceleration: 0-100km/h: 7.0sec (tested)
Plus: Performance and smoothness; four-up ride; adjustable handling; superb vision
Minus: Utilitarian appearance, outside and in; all-terrain tyres
Verdict: 8.0/10

Price as tested: $46,975 *Includes Technology Pack ($1600) and premium paint ($385)
NCAP rating: 5 stars (Aus)
Fuel economy: 12.9L/100km (test average)
Acceleration: 0-100km/h: 7.4sec (tested)
Plus: Handling, steering and body control; excellent front seats; sporty engine
Minus: Packaging niggles; relative thirst; gearshift mechanism; bulky dash
Verdict: 7.5/10

Price as tested: $43,538 *Includes floor mats ($148)
NCAP rating: 5 stars (Aus)
Fuel economy: 10.2L/100km (test average)
Acceleration: 0-100km/h: 8.4sec (tested)
Plus: Slick and efficient; class-best quality and resale; styling presence; gearbox
Minus: Only comes alive when driven hard; firm seats; no rear vents
Verdict: 7.5/10

LPA Likeitleaseit Button 300X50

Sign up here to receive the latest round-up of Wheels news, reviews and video highlights straight to your inbox each week.

Want free access to 5 years of Wheels archive content? Sign up now!