2016 Honda Civic RS review

The RS badge carries a weight of expectation about it. Can the Honda Civic RS live up to it?

WHAT IS IT?
It’s the 10th generation of Honda’s small city car, arriving here initially as a sedan and ahead of an all-new hatchback’s arrival next year.

WHY WE’RE DRIVING IT
This is an important model for the Japanese carmaker. It’s a ground-up reinvention of the traditionally strong-selling model, and exposes us to our first taste of Honda’s “Earth Dreams” technology – the name it gives to its latest-generation drivelines.

MAIN RIVALS
Mazda 3, Toyota Corolla, Ford Focus, Nissan Pulsar, Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback, Holden Cruze

Honda -Civic -RS-rear -sideTHE WHEELS VERDICT
Honda appears to have turned out a seriously accomplished, convincing sedan. Dare we say it may have rediscovered its missing mojo.

PLUS: Composed ride and handling; spacious; good comfort behind the wheel
MINUS: Price a bit high compared with rivals; engine can get a bit vocal high in the range

THE WHEELS REVIEW
THINK ‘RS’ and a ballistic Ford hatch may come to mind, or a winged Porsche 911. Not so here: this 2016 Honda Civic is the most important car for a decade from the Japanese maker, and in this case the two famed letters apply to the niche in the line-up formerly known as the Civic Sport.

The Civic sedan has arrived ahead of next year’s hatch, and everything about this car is new: from the platform, engine and transmission to the lightweight body. It’s the first ground-up new car from the maker in the wake of the 2008-09 global financial crisis, and comes with an unprecedented five-year investment after Honda Japan admitted the last Civic missed the mark.

Honda -Civic -RS-sideCalling this car an RS is like describing pods as proper coffee, or Adam Sandler as an actor: it’s just not accurate. Nomenclature aside, this 10th-generation Civic is a significant step up. Striking looks supplant the safe, simple exterior of the previous model. The athletic design, with muscular haunches – look at those front guards – starts with a low nose that sweeps over to a coupe-like roofline. The RS tops it with a bootlid spoiler and 17-inch alloys. It’s hardly dapper, but the new Civic is confident with a distinct identity.

It’s bigger, too: 104mm longer to stretch 4644m; 44mm wider at 1755mm; but it sits 19mm lower. The wheelbase is stretched 30mm to 2700mm – longer than the original Accord Euro – for 55mm extra rear legroom, where there’s genuine space for three adults, and a huge 517 litre boot. This is a truly mid-size car, far from the demure city-centric 1972 original.

That means more space up front, too, in an interior that easily eclipses the current car’s. There’s an excellent driving position, with loads of (electric) adjustment for the supportive, well-bolstered driver’s seat with rake and reach for the steering column as well. The A-pillars are angled for maximum visibility.

Honda -Civic -RS-front -sTactile materials garnish a handsome, elegant layout. The 7.0-inch touchscreen sits above a symmetrical console, and up front are crisp digital instruments. The controls have a solid feel, while Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity cover most of the population. Sat-nav and a set of cameras – including a blind-spot camera that operates automatically when you indicate to merge left – are standard, as is a suite of airbags that has Honda anticipating a top five-star ANCAP score.

The RS comes with one of two engines. A carryover 1.8-litre four powers entry-level Civics, but an all-alloy, direct injection 1.5-litre turbo four-cylinder mated exclusively to a new CVT powers RS and higher-spec models. It’s the first complete ‘Earth Dreams’ drivetrain. On paper, it stacks up: 127kW is one of the most potent in this class, 13kW more than its predecessor. Better is that fact that it uses 1.5L/100km less fuel, at an official 6.0L/100km.

On the road, it proves a winning combination, pulling strongly with 220Nm of torque from 1750rpm right through to 5500rpm. The CVT has stepped ‘gears’, accessed by steering-wheel mounted paddle-shifters. It’s smooth and doesn’t loiter at high revs like many CVTs, behaving more like a conventional automatic.

The throttle’s easily modulated, and there’s plenty of power for overtaking, but high in the rev range this engine is a little vocal. That would be acceptable, but the boisterous note lacks the character or verve typical of heyday Hondas. It’s a minor criticism of an otherwise polished driveline.

Honda -Civic -RS-interiorIt’s the chassis that really shows Honda’s head – and heart – is back in the right place. The ride of this car, which has a strut front end and a five-link rear, is class-leading. It’s compliant, yet never crashy and maintains suppleness even on rough roads, over brutal surface changes and allows the Civic to track straight and true. It’s teamed with body control with almost no acceleration squat, little nose dive when using the brilliant, firm brake pedal, and well-managed roll on longer corners and super-tight turns. That’s in part due to more extensive use of high-tensile steel, with the Civic’s body 25 percent more rigid than its predecessor. With excellent, fluid electric steering, the Civic is truly fun to drive at speed, yet also refined and well-mannered around town.

Adding to that is the high level of refinement. With no rattles or squeaks from the tight cabin, you’ll find yourself meandering higher up the speedo.

Honda has indeed found its mojo. To some the new Civic RS may not not perfect – the looks can be a bit polarising, the engine could have more charm and its price isn’t as sharp as some rivals – but it’s a seriously accomplished, convincing sedan. It has an exceptional ride, superbly tuned chassis and is a ball to drive quickly, while offering a practical and spacious package.

The new Civic RS is a convincing return to form for Honda.

SPECS
Model: 2016 Honda Civic RS sedan
Engine: 1498cc 4cyl, dohc, 16v, turbo
Power: 127kW@5500rpm
Torque: 220Nm@1700-5500rpm
Transmission: CVT automatic
Weight: 1331kg
0-100km/h: 8.0sec (estimated)
Fuel economy: 6.0L/100km
Price: $31,790
On sale: June

Mazda

In the market for a new car? Check out Australia's Best Value Cars.

Sign up here to receive the latest round-up of Wheels news, reviews and video highlights straight to your inbox each week.

Want free access to 5 years of Wheels archive content? Sign up now! 

DISCUSSION

25 Comments
  • YOU ARE ALL ********!
  • YOU ARE ALL ********!
  • YOU ARE ALL ********!
  • YOU ARE ALL ********!
  • AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • @TigerShark88 AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • @Bruce AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • @Drew AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • @DB AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • @JVVoid AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • @Pommyman AND YOU ARE A ********!
  • @DB MT is for gen V...AT is for gen W & CVT is for gen Y..
  • I have a 2014 Civic manual that I love, but would love to have the same gearbox mated to a stronger engine, but alas it looks as though Honda won't be doing that so I'll probably be looking elsewhere next small car upgrade.
  • This is a $27k car, not $32 - and really it should be $25k with a man tranny.
  • @F Go back to steering your lounge chair. Drivers want a manual transmission.
  • Also, manual versions for the 1.5l turbo are coming to US but unlikely to arrive in AU.
  • The AU (Thai built) Civic acceleration for 0-100 kmh seems to be a fair bit slower than the US version which can do 0-60 mph (0-96kmh) in around 6.7 seconds. Allowing for an extra 4kmh and acceleration rate, 0-100 should be more like 7.2 seconds or less. Anyway, as is, 8 seconds 0-100kmh (estimated) is similar acceleration to the Mazda 3 SP25 6AT with 138Kw. The Civic hatch coming next year is expected to get a 150Kw version of the 1.5L turbo petrol which should be a bit faster again. Some differences in Civic spec for various markets: AU spec gets paddle shift whereas the US Version as none. US gets heated rear seats. China version gets engine Auto stop/start, Malaysia version is the only one which gets dedicated rear AC vents.
  • Suddenly, the driving "experts" are all complaining about the lack of manual transmission.
  • Srongly agree with Drew. As a long-time Honda fan (three accords, all manual transmissions) I will definitely be moving away from Honda when I trade up my Accord Euro. Honda continues to produce first class vehicles, but their business decision not to include manual transmissions for their top end models means no more for me.
  • An RS model with no option for a manual transmission? No thanks, Honda. I'm stunned that Damion doesn't even mention this as a concern.
  • Well 0-100km 8 sec's! Yew! Not. How can a manufacturer so long associated with Motorsport think this is good enough? People would prefer to pay more, for greater performance. Especially given prior Type R performance.
  • Such a disappointment from 2015 Type RS. Pathetic.