Fiat 500 v Nissan Micra v Suzuki Celerio comparison review

Fiat 500 v Nissan Micra v Suzuki Celerio comparison review

These babies are among the smallest and cheapest cars in Australia, but they are bursting with brio and bonhomie.

First published in the June 2015 issue of Wheels magazine, Australia’s most experienced and most trusted car magazine since 1953.

Can’t wait to see the final scores? Jump to the verdict now.

CHEAP cars are revolting. No, we’re not talking about bargain-basement downers like the Chery J1 or Mitsubishi Mirage, but a promising new wave of inexpensive urban runabouts that deliver a surprising amount of driving pleasure. Affordable fun without any nasty aftertaste, if you will.

The brilliant Volkswagen Up may have left the building last year, but there’s still some life in the so-called Micro class, with two newcomers lobbing for our attention. Suzuki leads the charge with the Celerio while Nissan has finally introduced the facelifted Micra, almost two years after it surfaced abroad.

Good things in small packages

Silly name aside, Suzuki’s Alto replacement hits the ground running with $12,990 drive-away pricing for the 1.0-litre three-cylinder five-speed manual. Not short on spec, it includes Bluetooth audio streaming, power windows, electric mirrors and a trip computer. And, sadly, cartoonish styling, like Chicken Little on wheels.

Suzuki -Celerio -frontThe sky almost fell in for this Thai-built hatch, following a scandal involving repeated UK brake failures. But Suzuki acted fast and fixed the issue, so no local cars are affected. Just to make sure, we slammed those stoppers numerous times.

Micra is priced from $13,490 and the refreshed ST 1.2 three-cylinder five-speed manual gains less ghastly plastics to go with a more mature centre console, sharper-looking nose, different tail-lights and tailgate, standard cruise control (a segment first, and missing in the others), fold-down driver’s left armrest, rear power windows, upgraded multimedia with (at times patchy) full Bluetooth and USB connectivity, a boot light and a full-size spare. And it’s the only five-seater in this group. Feature for feature, the Micra is anything but.

Nissan -Micra -frontBoth these babies are taking on one of our remaining sub-B faves, the Fiat 500. With 3000 sold here last year – second in class behind Mitsubishi’s ailing Mirage – the post-modern Cinquecento is a natural.

But can the Little Lollobrigida stand the heat? In this assembly of all-atmo aspirants, the 500 is eight years old, two doors short and missing essentials like a proper glovebox, split/fold rear backrests and audio streaming. Plus, after last August’s ‘Series 3’ refresh, the base Pop 1.2 four-cylinder five-speed manual rocketed from $14,000 drive-away to $16,000 plus on-roads, though dealers regularly discount to the old price. Check the papers.

Fiat -500-rearImportantly, the Polish-made Italian is alone here in offering five-star safety (the others get four), seven airbags, auto power windows, time-delay auto headlights, leather-clad steering wheel, massive seat angle adjustment, a hill-hold function and Fiat’s City mode steering that makes parking a cinch. All are surprise-and-delight features rare at this price point.

Climb in and chill out

That all counts for diddly if the Fiat’s lack of rear doors strikes it from shopping lists, but consider this: at least the pair of doors the 500 does have shut solid, open wide and feature handy shoulder-height, front-seat slide releases with previous-position memory for effortless back-seat access.

However, the Celerio beats the 500 for entry and egress excellence. Suzuki clearly designed its city car from the inside out, with exceptional interior packaging enhanced by deep windows and lofty seating that heighten the sense of space.

Celerio’s Swift-style dash is a model of clarity and functional cohesiveness, but after the funky Alto it’s all a bit dull and conventional. Some polka-dot trim patterns attempt to groove things up, but practicality wins the day with cupholders, overhead grab handles, a map pocket, ISOFIX child-seat points and a 254-litre boot (a smidge more than Micra and nearly 70 litres ahead of the Fiat’s shallow cargo area, though only the Nissan sports a full-size spare).  

Suzuki -Celerio -interiorOn the flipside, the Celerio loses points with a clammy steering wheel, tinny audio sound quality, and front headrests and rear backrests that jut out too far, a potential deal-breaker for sensitive physiques.

Aside from sharing a commanding driving position and subsequent excellent views all round, the Celerio’s weaknesses are Micra’s strengths. The Nissan’s steering wheel, stereo and rear backrests are strong points, but it squanders its five-seat advantage spectacularly with a torturously bony cushion and poor rear packaging hampered by a sloping roofline (unlike the palatial Suzuki). Also, our test car’s seat cloth trim sagged alarmingly in places, and having no lane-change indicator is downright annoying these days.

Nissan -Micra -interiorThe Fiat, in contrast, suffers from no such incongruities, due to ambience and quality that seems like the difference between economy and business class. But it isn’t perfect. For instance, the driving position is oddly upright and perched, the left footrest is too high, the centre console fouls your knees and greater seat and/or steering column adjustability is required. The 500 forces its driver to mould around it, rather than the other way around. And if you don’t fit, too bad. Other foibles include limited rear-seat headroom, poor storage, cluttered instruments (only up-spec models get the TFT screen) and a shallow boot.

However, no rival can match the Fiat’s evocatively retro single-binnacle dash, glossy painted fascia, leather wheel, snooker-ball gearknob, fashionable houndstooth seat material and lashings of faux chrome.

Fiat -500-interiorThe 500 can also do sensible. Its seats are the most supportive, the plastics seem hardy, and four average-size adults should fit comfortably, despite this group’s shortest wheelbase, thanks to foot room under the front seats. And the Fiat’s City steering effort-lightener and large glass area truly aid tight-spot manoeuvrability.

There’s also far less mechanical and road noise intrusion, while not a rattle was detected in our high-mileage test car. Shocked? Don’t be. Fiat has been at it since 1899, with benchmark-setting babies like the Topolino (1936-55), Bambino (1957-75) and Cinquecento (1991-98). It also has this group’s longest warranty.

Lining up at the lights

Nowhere is Fiat’s experience more obvious than on the road, despite relying on a 30-year-old engine. Far from being shamed by its three-cylinder competition, the Pop’s 51kW/102Nm 1.2-litre four-pot eight-valve single-cammer surprises with a velvety flexibility in keeping with its lush ambience.

Smart gearing helps the Fiat’s lively off-the-line acceleration, but beware a flat-spot if the revs drop and you’re in a ratio too high. Pleasingly, then, the five-speeder’s shift quality is the slickest (yet weightiest) here, so the required rowing along isn’t a burden.

Fiat -500-rearThe numbers don’t tell the whole story, however. The Pop’s 0-100km/h time of 14.1sec might be almost a second adrift of the Micra and 1.2sec slower than the brisk Suzuki, but the gaps narrow significantly approaching highway speeds, with the 500 pulling willingly into the 120km/h range without straining. Maybe that’s the four-cylinder advantage, though a preference for premium unleaded is a disadvantage.

Stepping into the Micra is sobering because, while its 1.2 triple is the power leader here at 56kW/104Nm, it’s the heaviest of the tots, 113kg more than the featherweight Suzuki. So the Nissan is a tad lethargic off the line and doesn’t really hit its stride until well past 4000rpm. The ST’s leading third-gear 80-120km/h acceleration time (10.0sec) reflects the strength and resilience of its top end.

Nissan -Micra -RearThat would all be okay if the drivetrain wasn’t so coarse and loud – made worse by industrial-level air-con noises – with the notchiest gearshift action here. And at 7.3L/100km against 6.4 for the Fiat and only 5.8 for the Suzuki, it needs to lighten up on the unleaded. 

Miserly as the Celerio is, its sparkling 50kW/90Nm 1.0-litre triple is a terrific performer in and out of town, sweeping the 830kg hatch along with infectious enthusiasm. Fizzy without the buzz, its linear torque delivery is a boon, backed up by a sweet and light shift action. This car is happy to crawl around in top gear without hesitation.

Short, sharp and nippy

It’s therefore disheartening that Suzuki didn’t go the extra mile with the steering, which has a sticky straight-ahead dead spot that robs it of potential go-kart dartiness and feel. Beyond that, the Celerio is remarkably responsive and fluent on a winding road, soaking up bumps with a suppleness normally reserved for better French runabouts. There’s more Swift in the Celerio than its frumpy form suggests.

Suzuki -Celerio -rearAge seems to have caught up with the Micra because it feels loose and leaden by comparison, the tyres roaring in protest as the Nissan leans and understeers through the same corners at the same speeds. Silver at COTY 2010 seems a long time ago.

Yet the group’s veteran, the 500, still shows the way dynamically, with the sharpest steering, underscoring the most agile and composed chassis of the trio. The helm is the most alive for both interaction and feedback, without feeling too nervous. And while the short wheelbase makes it bob around at speed on bumpy roads, it remains planted and controlled. ESC intervention on gravel is the gentlest by some margin, further highlighting the car’s engineering thoroughness.

Okay, we’ll play favourites

Besides its timeless beauty, that’s what separates the 500 from the Celerio and Micra. It’s the only car here that looks and feels like one you’d choose out of desire rather than economic necessity. Just don’t pay full price for a Pop – not when it was $14K drive-away little more than a year ago. That should be your haggling starting point. We’re not mugs, Fiat.

Seeing past the Celerio’s dowdiness isn’t easy, but it rises above its pricing with an exceptional drivetrain, packaging and chassis composure. Think of it as a roomier Swift, but hit with the dorky stick. So close.

Micra isn’t disgraced, but it’s clearly off the pace against such polar-opposite obsessives. While showing wrinkles in the drivetrain, dynamics and refinement, the Nissan still presents a sound (if noisy) value proposition. It’s far from the worst in class.

The good news is that all three of our sub-B babies prove that there’s still plenty of life – and plenty to like – at the most affordable end of the market, even if VW’s impressive Up couldn’t make it work.

Endangered species

INEXPLICABLY, unlike everywhere else on the planet, Fiat Australia positions Panda above rather than below the 500, explaining why the five-seater is as rare here as its animal namesake. And just as endangered, too, if the company’s inability to find us a $16,500 Pop manual – currently $14,500 drive-away – for this comparo is any indication. Curious pricing and invisible marketing suggest Panda fans ought to be quick before it goes the way of the VW Up. And that would be a shame for there’s more than enough Cinquecento-derived chassis goodness to justify the Panda’s continued existence.

European exodus

DESPITE increasing congestion, local Micro-segment sales slipped by 30 percent last year, to fewer than 16,000 units. That’s why we’re denied some of Europe’s most beguiling babies, including the rear-engined, rear-drive Renault Twingo and its Smart ForFour twin, the Opel Adam, Toyota Aygo/Peugeot 108/Citroen C1 triplets, Hyundai i10 and the recently discontinued VW Up and its Skoda Citigo sibling.

At least Kia is seriously considering the latest Picanto, also from Europe. Two years ago we drove one in the UK and were impressed with its style, refinement, maturity and efficiency. Brand loyalty is best achieved by snaring young buyers starting out, so if Fiat can make the 500 work here, the others can, too.


Price as tested: $16,000
NCAP rating: 5 stars (Aus)
Fuel economy: 6.4L/100km (test average)
Acceleration: 0-100km/h: 14.1sec (tested)
Plus: Timeless design; quality cabin; sharp steering; raspy engine; little extras
Minus: Relatively expensive; odd driving position; practicality/storage
Verdict: 7.0/10

Price as tested: $12,990 *Drive-away price
NCAP rating: 4 stars (Aus)
Fuel economy: 5.8L/100km (test average)
Acceleration: 0-100km/h: 12.9sec (tested)
Plus: Strong engine; supple ride; amusing handling; massive cabin; ace value
Minus: Dorky styling; on-centre steering laziness; intrusive front headrests
Verdict: 7.0/10

Price as tested: $13,490
NCAP rating: 4 stars (Aus)
Fuel economy: 7.3L/100km (test average)
Acceleration: 0-100km/h: 13.2sec (tested)
Plus: Big space; top-end power; high spec; five seats; decent audio/multimedia
Minus: Notchy gearshift; ill-fitting trim; flawed rear seat; poor tyres
Verdict: 5.5/10

LPA Likeitleaseit Button 300X50

Sign up here to receive the latest round-up of Wheels news, reviews and video highlights straight to your inbox each week.

Want free access to 5 years of Wheels archive content? Sign up now!